Umer Maqbool
The ongoing delimitation exercise has deepened anxieties in Jammu and Kashmir, as it is being viewed by many as yet another attempt to disem-power the Kashmir Valley and Muslim-majority Chenab and Pir Panchal regions of Jammu province.
The redrawing of the electoral map of J&K has been a longstanding agenda of the Bharatiya Janta Party, which has been raising the bogey of “under-representation of Jammu region” in the electoral politics of J&K since 1995 when the last delimita-tion exercise took place in the erstwhile state.
The exercise is part of the constitutional and le-gal changes effected by the BJP-led Union govern-ment in August 2019 when it stripped J&K of its special status and downgraded it into a Union territory.
‘Under-representation and reality’ The BJP’s two-decade old claim of Jammu’s under-representation does not withstand scrutiny.
Going by 2011 Census figures and the number of assembly segments that each region in J&K as-sembly has, Jammu region is better placed than Kashmir.
The total population of Jammu & Kashmir UT, according to the Census, is 1,22, 67,013 out of whom 68,88, 475 people are in Kashmir region and 53,78, 538 in Jammu.
Currently, Kashmir Valley has 46 seats in the Assembly and Jammu has 37 seats. This means Kashmir, which accounts for 56.15% of the popula-tion of the UT, has 55.42 % representation in the assembly and Jammu, where 43.84 % of the popula-tion resides, has 44.57 % representation.
The average population per assembly segment in Kashmir is 1,49,749 and 1,45,365 in Jammu.
A cursory look at community-wise representa-tion in the last assembly of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir reveals that Hindus are better represented than Muslims.
Muslim representation in J&K’s last Assembly was 66.66% (58 MLAs) against 68% population of the community in the erstwhile state. On the other hand, the Hindu community, which formed 28.44% of the population of the erstwhile state, had 31% (27 MLAs) representation in House.
The number of seats was increased in Jammu region in the past six decades is more than double when compared to Kashmir.
While Kashmir has seen an overall increase of three seats, Jammu’s seat tally has gone up by seven.
In the first assembly election held in 1957, 43 seats were in Kashmir Valley, 30 in Jammu, and two in Ladakh, which is no longer part of J&K after reorganisation of the erstwhile state.
A simple calculation, on the basis of population (2011 Census), reveals that Kashmir’s seat tally should go up to 51 from existing 46 and Jammu should get two more seats, which would increase its strength to 39 from 37.
Fears and fallout A Muslim has always been head of an elected government in J&K. Many fear that the exercise could be used to fulfill BJP’s ambi-tion of installing a Hindu chief minister in the Mus-lim majority region or leave a Kashmiri chief minis-ter completely at the mercy of Jammu votes.
“There are apprehensions that the process is aimed at realising the political vision of a particular party in J&K wherein, like other things, the views and wishes of the people of J&K would be consid-ered the least.
It is widespread belief that contours and outcome of the exercise are pre-planned and the exercise, per say, is a mere formality,” Peoples De-mocratic Party’s general secretary, Ghulam Nabi Hanjura wrote in a letter to the delimitation com-mission, which is currently in J&K.
The political parties fear that disproportionate weightage to non-population factors like inaccessi-bility, tough terrain and facilities of communication during the delimitation exercise could be used to reduce Kashmir’s political supremacy.
Owing to these apprehensions, all major politi-cal forces on Tuesday, July 6, requested the delimi-tation commission to conduct the exercise of rear-ranging constituencies on the basis of population.
“Population has to be the only norm as has been the practice in the past in J&K and elsewhere in the country,” the National Conference said.
Former bureaucrat Lateef-ul- Zaman Deva told The Wire that the population is the primary factor for determining delimitation of electoral constitu-encies and not the number of voters or size of an area.
“Delhi has an area of 1483 square kilometres but it has been given seven seats on the basis of its population.
Uttar Pradesh with an area of 2.48 lakh square kilometres has 80 Lok Sabha seats whereas Madhya Pradesh with an area of 3.08 lakh square kilometres has 29 seats.
The number of seats is more in UP than MP because the former has a popu-lation of 20 crore and the latter 7.27 crore.
This establishes beyond any doubt tat population is the main factor for delimitation and not the lifeless land mass,” he said.
The biggest worry in Jammu’s Chenab Valley and in the Rajouri district of Pir Panchal region is that BJP could redraw boundaries of constituencies in such a way so that chances of its candidates win-ning increases.
“There are apprehensions that the whole exer-cise is being done to benefit BJP as they had also carved out constituencies as per their will during district development council (DDC) elections held last year,” says Asim Hashmi, a lawyer who de-feated BJP’s former minister and vice-president Shakti Raj Parihar in the DDC polls.
Asim, who won from Hindu-dominated Gundna DDC segment of Doda district, said that BJP would not be benefitted from the exercise in Chenab region if delimitation is carried out in accordance with laws governing the process.
“The commission should determine the seats on the basis of population and that ensure that they are geographically compact,” he said.
The buzz in political corridors of J&K is that two politicians, both from the Jammu province, have switched loyalties from their respective parties and ended up joining a political party which is seen close to BJP to protect their interests during delimi-tation.
But how did this come to be? No delimitation exercise was possible in J&K till 2031. This was before August 2019 when BJP-led Union govern-ment, along with effecting other constitutional and legal changes, repealed the law governing delimita-tion in the erstwhile state.
The Union thus incorporated provisions for un-dertaking delimitation in The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.
Under the law, the J&K Assembly would have 90 seats, excluding the 24 seats reserved for areas which are part of areas across the Line of Control.
The delimitation panel is also empowered to re-serve seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Assembly.
NC participates, PDP boycotts The constituents of Peoples Alliance for Gupkar Declaration (PAGD) are not on the same page over meeting the visiting delimitation panel.
While National Conference, in a departure from its earlier position, met the panel, the Peoples Democratic Party stayed away from meet-ing the commission.
In its memorandum submitted to the commis-sion, National Conference questioned the legal va-lidity of the panel, saying the delimitation of con-stituencies can be undertaken once the figures of the first Census after the year 2026 are published.
The party, in its memorandum, submitted that the delimitation exercise would be a credible effort in strengthening democracy only after full statehood is restored to J&K.
“However, despite our basic reservations on the issue, the Hon’ble commission has decided to go ahead with the delimitation process.
While reiterat-ing our stand and without prejudice to the submis-sions made above, we request you and other Hon’ble members of the Commission to carry out the delimitation exercise in a free, fair and transpar-ent manner so that the unity and integrity of the state is safeguarded,” read the memorandum.
Earlier the party had decided against participat-ing in proceedings of the commission, saying the law under which it was established has been chal-lenged by the party in the Supreme Court.
Its three Lok Sabha MPs including president Dr. Farooq Abdullah boycotted a meeting of the panel held in February.
— Courtesy The Wire
