THE announcement of the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) promise to allow climate protests during the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) is a noteworthy development in the realm of environmental activism. By convening nations, activists, scientists and stakeholders, COP28 addresses the pressing challenge of environmental degradation. The world faces a critical juncture in confronting the swiftly evolving climate crisis. As the impact of climate change grows more apparent, the urgency to combat this global threat intensifies. COP28, a pivotal event in the fight against climate change, serves as a forum for nations, activists and leaders to deliberate strategies and commitments that can shape our planet’s future. Amidst this backdrop, the unheard voices need a centred space as the existing political space is dominated by exploitative forces.
Former Uruguayan President José Mujica’s observed that it’s politics that failed us but not science. The world’s struggle against climate change is increasingly seen as a result of political inertia rather than a lack of scientific comprehension. Economic interests often take precedence over essential climate policies. The inability to break free from vested financial interests obstructs effective solutions, underscoring the need for political will and international cooperation.
Mujica’s recognition that transnational corporations wield more influence than some states underscores a stark reality: globalization has prioritized markets over political action. The pursuit of economic growth and power, sometimes at the expense of environmental sustainability, highlights the challenge of harmonizing economic development with ecological preservation. Diplomacy interwoven with arms trade further underscores the intricacies of global decision-making. The paradoxical link between arms industry profits and collective well-being emphasizes the need to redefine global priorities.
The climate crisis revolves around the balance between individualism and cooperation. While individuality is inherent, excessive hyper-individualism can hinder collective action required to address global issues. Politics, as Mujica suggests, bridges individual interests and communal welfare. Throughout history, cooperation has fostered thriving civilizations amidst conflicts. However, facing challenges like climate change necessitates a new form of global organization. Convincing the majority of the importance of cooperation and co-management becomes pivotal to navigate ahead.
In the context of COP28 and the broader climate change movement, diverse voices advocate change and responsibility. Figures like Greta Thunberg resonate with millions, underscoring that incremental changes may not suffice against irreversible climate impact. Limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C remains an immense challenge, extending beyond mere emissions reduction. Tipping points, feedback loops, equity and climate justice underline the necessity for comprehensive strategies.
Leonardo DiCaprio’s impassioned 2014 UN Climate Summit speech underscores urgency, echoing that COP numbers are irrelevant without substantive action. COP28 signifies more than a gathering; it confronts the political underpinnings of the climate crisis. While science informs us, political choices dictate our trajectory. The interconnection of environmental degradation, economic interests and political inaction accentuates the complexity of challenges.
As COP28 unfolds, it is evident that climate change activism and protests play a vital role in driving discussions and advocating for action. Grassroots movements and passionate individuals, particularly youth activists like Greta Thunberg, have placed climate change on the global agenda, demanding accountability from leaders. However, translating these voices into effective policies requires political will and global collaboration. COP28 transcends a mere summit; it signifies a crucial moment where nations must prioritize long-term planetary survival over short-term economic gains.
Left-wing and Marxist perspectives assert that the capitalist pursuit of profit is intrinsically tied to ecological degradation. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels argue that capitalism’s drive for infinite growth fuels reckless natural resource consumption and environmental exploitation. In today’s context, unchecked capitalism exacerbates climate change through resource consumption and energy production. Contemporary Marxist writer Naomi Klein contends in “This Changes Everything” that capitalism’s reliance on fossil fuels obstructs climate action, prioritizing profit over the environment.
Protests and social movements critically emphasize the urgency of climate action. Left-wing thinkers stress mass mobilization to challenge the status quo. Antonio Gramsci’s writings highlight civil society’s potential to shape public consciousness and induce systemic change. Climate change protests, epitomized by Greta Thunberg’s Global Climate Strikes, align with Gramsci’s concept of counter-hegemony—challenging dominant ideologies for transformative action. These protests contest capitalism-driven policies that perpetuate ecological harm.
While COP28 provides a platform for global climate responses, left-wing and Marxist thinkers argue that it often falls short in addressing systemic issues. Environmental activist Vandana Shiva criticizes capitalism’s commodification of nature, asserting that global North’s dominance perpetuates ecological imbalances, disproportionately affecting the global South. Samir Amin’s writings underline the link between imperialism and environmental degradation, highlighting how resource exploitation in the global South enriches the North at marginalized nations’ expense.
Left-wing and Marxist writers propose alternative paths to address climate change. Ecosocialism, championed by Michael Lowy and John Bellamy Foster, merges ecological concerns with socialist principles. This approach advocates democratic production ownership and resource allocation to tackle environmental roots. Eco-Marxism, advanced by thinkers like John Bellamy Foster, demands a reconsideration of our relationship with nature, redefining progress beyond economic growth.
COP28 provides a platform for global climate discourse, while left-wing and Marxist perspectives offer vital critiques. Capitalism’s role in exacerbating crises, protest power and global inequalities underscore the need for systemic change. Addressing climate change demands confronting intertwined capitalism, inequality and exploitation. Only through comprehensive transformation can we mitigate climate change impacts and forge a sustainable future. COP28 symbolizes the convergence of global leaders, activists, and concerned citizens to tackle climate challenges. Political shortcomings prioritizing economic interests over environmental preservation have brought us to this critical point. Observations from figures like José Mujica, Greta Thunberg and Leonardo DiCaprio illuminate the intricate interplay of politics, economics and environment. In navigating the 21st century uncertainties, the collective responsibility for a sustainable path transcends borders and personal interests. COP28 signifies humanity’s resolve to discover common ground and embark on a journey to a greener, equitable future.
—The writer is a Chief Executive of Global Strategic Institute for Sustainable Development (GSISD)-A research and development organization based in Islamabad.
Email: shakeelgsisd@gmail.com
